Looking for missing posts?

TV, Music and Media posts have moved to a new site. Go to http://burnthismedia.blogspot.com/ the new entertainment blog.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Jared Lee Loughner -- The Rapid Decline

I was startled when I saw the mugshot today of accused mass murderer Jared Lee Loughner.  I knew he was 22 at the time of the shooting and had only seen his high school yearbook picture:

 
as well as another, more recent photo:

Those photos were significant just in how ordinary they were.  The first image was of a curly-haired teenager, no different from any other kid you'd see bagging your groceries or hanging out in a skate park. The second, a normal, indistinguishable twenty-something. 

This is what Jared Loughner looked like today:

This is the face of someone accused of killing six people, including a child.  How he went from the youth above to the frighteningly crazy-eyed man in the bottom photo in just a few short years, will be a cautionary tale for all of us. Because the signs of his rapid and extreme change were all there.  From his dropping out of high school, to run-ins at junior college, to a failed attempt to enlist in the draft, to authoring nonsensical yet vitriolic rants, he was a ticking timebomb.  

Why he wasn't helped, how he slipped through our fingers, how he was allowed to plunge deeper into whatever strange thoughts possessed him is something we need to face. Immediately after the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the more than a dozen others, all the attention turned to the heated speech in our current political discord as having incited this shooting.  But it seems much more likely that what motivated and propelled the shooter will be much more mundane and less newsworthy than a Sarah Palin target map or the ravings of Glenn Beck.  It should be noted that Loughner's interest in the Congresswoman goes back to at least 2007 when he first saw her at a constituent meet-and-greet, a year before most of us had heard of Sarah Palin.

This is not one of those instances where after a suspect is named, those who knew him say, I never thought this could happen or this doesn't sound like the person I knew.  No, this is, sadly, one of those cases where someone's alleged connection with a horrific shooting is met not with shock but with acceptance.  A former classmate's emails about Loughner from last summer were reproduced in today's Washington Post.
June 1, the first day of class:


'One day down and nineteen to go. We do have one student in the class who was disruptive today, I'm not certain yet if he was on drugs (as one person surmised) or disturbed. He scares me a bit. The teacher tried to throw him out and he refused to go, so I talked to the teacher afterward. Hopefully he will be out of class very soon, and not come back with an automatic weapon.'

From June 10:

'As for me, Thursday means the end to week two of algebra class. It seems to be going by quickly, but then I do have three weeks to go so we'll see how I feel by then. Class isn't dull as we have a seriously disturbed student in the class, and they are trying to figure out how to get rid of him before he does something bad, but on the other hand, until he does something bad, you can't do anything about him. Needless to say, I sit by the door.'

From June 14:

'We have a mentally unstable person in the class that scares the living cr** out of me. He is one of those whose picture you see on the news, after he has come into class with an automatic weapon. Everyone interviewed would say, Yeah, he was in my math class and he was really weird. I sit by the door with my purse handy. If you see it on the news one night, know that I got out fast...'

Unfortunately, her emails, while prescient, did nothing to actually get Loughner whatever help he needed or protect the public from him before it was too late.

If Loughner is indeed the shooter, we can look closer to home for clues -- to his backyard with the makeshift shrine and plastic skull, to his rambling, incoherent thoughts and beliefs, to his drug use and to his presently uncooperative parents.  What we will find, ultimately, is that there is not one, easy explanation for such a horrific act of violence.  We will peel away at the many aspects of his personality and experiences and discover that it took a perfect storm of things going wrong for him to pick up that gun and aim it at his fellow human beings.  What is tragic is that the signs he was heading in that direction were apparently there, but no one knew what to do with them.

8 comments:

  1. Another great post..such a tragedy..I can't believe how he transformed to the monster he became and no one noticed!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. @CJFan_Audrey (Twitter)January 10, 2011 at 6:15 PM

    SAD...sad is what this is. How does someone go from being the happy young man we saw in the 2nd picture to becoming a crazed mass murderer? A series in unfortunate events in this young man's life, coupled with the inability to handle them and probably a poor support system...maybe no one cared. Obviously, this person is mentally unstable and needed help a long time ago. That's why there needs to be better gun control, something that would make it impossible or at least extremely difficult for people like this to get their hands on a gun. It is amazing how the eyes really say a lot about a person's state of mind.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It was, probably, as you say, a perfect storm of things that led Jared to do what he did, and that certain people did not intervene enough upon signs that strongly indicated he was unstable. However, we cannot deny that vitriolic language and symbols used by political figures and commentators could have influenced him. There is simply no need for the violent, incendiary language used by many of our leaders. And we also have to acknowledge that lax gun control laws allowed him to obtain a gun he never should have been permitted to have.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If conservatives don't wish to cease the hyperbole, vitriol and blatant hate talk because it was not the direct cause of the senseless violent act, then how about not blocking gun control laws. Let's start there. What they have done -- give a crazy person easy access to a weapon. What they arguably did -- stoke the fires of a deeply troubled mind, by making it seem like reasonable, successful people of power and influence are ready to "reload" and "form a mass rebellion" when the public vote doesn't sway in their direction. Why is talk like that necessary from intelligent people if not to get the masses riled up? Maybe they aren't to blame now, but what will be enough to make them stop?

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's my understanding that schizophrenia tends to manifest in early adulthood. It could explain how an ordinary guy could turn so quickly into a delusional, paranoid person. It sounds like the people at the community college did try to get him help, indirectly but suspending him from class until he got a psych exam. I guess his parents couldn't persuade him to do so, or didn't want to believe it... or maybe the kid didn't have health insurance and didn't think there was anything wrong with himself. In any case, the fact that he was able to get an extended mag for his gun is disturbing. I understand law abiding people have the right to bear arms in this country, but come on.

    That said, I do think vitriolic and incendiary speech can push some people over the edge. Maybe it's only 1 out of 100 but if that one is armed... It's not just this guy either, it's that guy who killed a guard at the Holocost museum, that father and son team who tried to blow up a bank and shot cops, it's Timothy McVeigh. And of course, Osama bin Ladin didn't fly those planes into the WTC and the Pentagon.He incited others to do it. I think the fear-mongering and reducing political opponents to "evil" incites fearful, paranoid, prejudiced, desperate and the already suicidal to act on their impulses and lash out violently at others.

    -Mary

    ReplyDelete
  6. While you were brushing along the edges of this news item, I'm surprised you didn't even refer to your position on gun control. Is it nuanced or absolute? I look forward to your thoughts like looters and the mob look forward to Santa!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm not in favor of repealing the second amendment and I can understand why having a gun, for some people in some situations makes sense. And I appreciate gun enthusiasts who want to shoot targets or even game. But I believe we can limit/restrict what types of weapons and ammunition are available, how people qualify to purchase them, what kinds of background checks are required, what penalities there should be for people who help others circumvent gun restrictions and so on. We need reasonable, rational restrictions that protect citizen's rights to own guns while also protecting our safety and security.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It’s my first time to visit this site & I’m really surprised to see such impressive stuff out there.
    casinon utan spelpaus

    ReplyDelete