One of the more interesting biennial occurrences in America is the midterm election. It is usually not so much about the candidates or issues of that election cycle, as much as a response to what happened two years earlier. The midterm election is the electorate’s response to the President and Congress’ symbolic “How’s my driving?” bumper sticker.
We’ve had the “contract with America” election of 1994 in which the voters told Bill Clinton and the Democratic-controlled Congress we’re not happy. In 2006, it was the Republican president and representatives who heard the deafening “NO!” from the voters. It’s time again for the disgruntled and disillusioned to have their say, and pollsters and prognosticators are predicting a landslide victory for Republican candidates in the house with strong gains in the Senate and the State houses.
I would think that this year, it would be hard to find a voter who wasn’t angry with those in power. On the Liberal side of the spectrum, you voted for “change” only to see most of your key issues not addressed. Yes, a form of health care restructuring was passed, but it was not as extreme as the Liberals wanted. “Don’t ask, don’t tell” is still being supported by this administration in the courts, we’re still in Iraq and Pakistan, even Gitmo is still open.
Moderates who believed that Obama would bring bipartisan change to Washington have seen him lock Republicans out of meetings and promote divisiveness. They’ve seen money poured into solve every problem, the administration giving more handouts than a pedophile at Halloween.
Conservatives have seen every core value they hold dear come under attack and they’ve been ridiculed and marginalized as crazy extremists. Those who wanted limited government and tax relief have been labeled as evil or uncaring. Our president has recently told Republicans, they can get on the bus, but they’ll have to sit in the back.
So if no one is happy with the direction this President and this Congress are taking America, what will happen tomorrow? Much depends, as it always does, on voter turnout. There is no clearer way to make your opinion known that to vote. For all the water cooler talk, blogging, posting, tweeting, calling into talk radio, it is only what you do tomorrow that really matters.
I live in California where Republicans have put up two candidates for the major contests that have failed to ignite voter excitement. Meg Whitman has run a confusing campaign for Governor, spending too much time trying to court unlikely voters rather than rallying the Republican base. This is not the year to pander or run as a moderate. Carly Fiorina could have won in a landslide if she just ran commercials of Senator Boxer talking. Whether she was a godsend at Hewlett-Packard or just another overpaid executive, she would be infinitely better for California than the “reliably liberal” Boxer.
As a Republican, I hope the turnout of other Republicans in California will be great enough to overcome the less than electrifying campaigns these two women have run. And if they have to win by virtue of anti-Obama, anti-Brown and anti-Boxer votes, rather than based on any voter enthusiasm for them, I’ll take it.
If you want to have your voice heard, if you are not happy with the direction the country is moving, then say something where and when it counts. VOTE tomorrow.
BRAVO!!!!! I would give you a standing ovation for this extraordinary article if I could!!! I agree with EVERY word of it....100%!!!!!
ReplyDeleteGreat article. I agree totally.
ReplyDeleteI know you are Republican, but it would have been more accurate and responsible to say that Liberals preferred a health care plan with a public option instead of saying they preferred a more "extreme" plan. Using the word "extreme" is resorting to biased demagogy, and is hypocritical considering in this same article you are criticizing Liberals for calling Conservatives crazy extremists.
ReplyDeleteThere are many inaccuracies in this article Shari. You're clearly a conservative - which is your right - but couldn't you have gotten your information from somewhere reliable instead of Fox News? For example: I saw the clip of President Obama's political rhetoric, saying that he hoped the Democrats would keep the keys to the "car" and the Republicans could come along for the ride, but they'd have to sit in the back. (Only on Fox, was that clip distorted into a "bus". Their false "reporting" has became fodder for many a joke on "The Daily Show") This one included! The Republicans in the house and senate vowed early on to withhold their support on bills that would have helped the American people. But their partisan agenda was more important, so they stubbornly filibustered whatever they had to to get their own way. The president attended Republican luncheons that were televised to try and bridge the gap, but Republican divisivness kept him at bay and from getting anything done. It was also the Republicans who blocked "Dont ask, don't tell". There are many clips of Senator McCain vowing to block it.
ReplyDeleteIt's clear we don't agree on politics, but we do agree on going out and voting!
The last two comments evidence a very myopic view of what actually happended. Democrats are getting exactly what they deserve in this election -- a visit to the same unemployment lines that they ignored in pursuit of their ideology. It is not time to put the partisian divide behind us; it is time to embrace it and be thankful that the Democrat's ideology has a very limited shelf-life.
ReplyDelete